On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 10:21 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:49 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > oh, hrm. Maybe I didn't think enough about how it's handed off to > > pdflush; I could rearrange if that makes sense? Or maybe handing to > > pdflush is wrong, it was just so convenient.... > > I don't understand the reason for handing it to pdflush. I would expect > thaw to be very fast. Do we expect it to block anywhere, and if so, for > very long? Not that I see any problem with it. Eric pointed out on irc that this is in interrupt context, so even taking a mutex is not allowed. I now agree that handing it to pdflush is reasonable. Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
