Andrew Morton: > > + atomic_inc_return(&lower_dentry->d_inode->i_count); > > + atomic_inc_return(&lower_inode->i_count); > > atomic_inc() would suffice here, yes? I thought that ..._return() is smp safe and necessary here. Because lower_inode may be touched by lower fs (outside of ecryptfs). Anyway my original patch seemed to be already dropped. J. R. Okajima -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
