Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 01:04:07 -0700
Cc: willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sunhao.th@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20211015080216.4871-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>

NAK.

1. We need to sort ounderlying issue first as I already said _twice_.
2. this has a major penality on all file systems

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()
  - From: Zqiang

References:
- [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()
  - From: Zqiang

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] mm: add anonymous vma name refcounting
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v7 22/28] fanotify: Report FID entry even for zero-length file_handle
Previous by thread: [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] fs: inode: use queue_rcu_work() instead of call_rcu()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux