Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:47:33 -0400
Cc: chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20210916182212.81608-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

I haven't tried to figure out why, but I notice after these patches that
pynfs tests RENEW3, LKU10, CLOSE9, and CLOSE8 are failing with
unexpected share denied errors.

--b.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server
  - From: dai . ngo

References:
- [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server
  - From: Dai Ngo

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vfs: add a zero-initialization mode to fallocate
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kernfs: fix the race in the creation of negative dentry
Previous by thread: [PATCH v3 1/3] fs/lock: add new callback, lm_expire_lock, to lock_manager_operations
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/2] nfsd: Initial implementation of NFSv4 Courteous Server
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux