On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 01:02:09AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > I can't answer for Matthew. > > Anon conversion patchset doesn't exists yet (but it is in plans) so > there's nothing to split out. Once someone will come up with such patchset > he has to sell it upstream on its own merit. Perhaps we've been operating under some incorrect assumptions then. If the current patch series doesn't actually touch anonymous pages - the patch series does touch code in e.g. mm/swap.c, but looking closer it might just be due to the (mis)organization of the current code - maybe there aren't any real objections left?