Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/9] exofs: osd Swiss army knife

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jamie Lokier wrote:
Having one super block would be silly.

Yep.


But aren't most kinds of replication better done behind the OSD level,
on the storage fabric?  OSD is all about letting the fabric decide
things like allocation and durability strategies after all.

Probably, but one cannot _assume_ that. The OSD device might just be a dumb, non-replicated OSD simulator, or in the future, a singleton SATA drive.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux