Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit c2f273ebd89a79ed87ef1025753343e327b99ac9 ] > > While comm change event via prctl has been reported to proc connector by > 'commit f786ecba4158 ("connector: add comm change event report to proc > connector")', connector listeners were missing comm changes by explicit > writes on /proc/[pid]/comm. > > Let explicit writes on /proc/[pid]/comm report to proc connector. This is a potential userspace ABI breakage? Why backport it? Especially if there is no one asking for the behavior change in userspace? Eric > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701133458epcms1p68e9eb9bd0eee8903ba26679a37d9d960@epcms1p6 > Signed-off-by: Ohhoon Kwon <ohoono.kwon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/proc/base.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c > index e5b5f7709d48..533d5836eb9a 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/base.c > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c > @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ > #include <linux/posix-timers.h> > #include <linux/time_namespace.h> > #include <linux/resctrl.h> > +#include <linux/cn_proc.h> > #include <trace/events/oom.h> > #include "internal.h" > #include "fd.h" > @@ -1674,8 +1675,10 @@ static ssize_t comm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, > if (!p) > return -ESRCH; > > - if (same_thread_group(current, p)) > + if (same_thread_group(current, p)) { > set_task_comm(p, buffer); > + proc_comm_connector(p); > + } > else > count = -EINVAL;