Re: gcc inlining heuristics was Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:02:17AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Something at the back of my mind said "aliasing".

$ gcc linus.c -O2 -S ; grep subl linus.s
        subl    $1624, %esp
$ gcc linus.c -O2 -S -fno-strict-aliasing; grep subl linus.s
        subl    $824, %esp

That's with 4.3.2.
Interesting.
Nonsensical, but interesting.

What I find nonsensical is that -fno-strict-aliasing generates
better code here. Normally one would expect the compiler seeing
more aliases with that option and then be more conservative
regarding any sharing. But it seems to be the other way round
here.

For this to be convolved with aliasing *AT ALL* indicates this is done incorrectly.

This is about storage allocation, not aliases. Storage allocation only depends on lifetime.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux