On 9/9/21 14:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > So what is the result here? Not having folios (with that or another > name) is really going to set back making progress on sane support for > huge pages. Both in the pagecache but also for other places like direct > I/O. Yeah, the silence doesn't seem actionable. If naming is the issue, I believe Matthew had also a branch where it was renamed to pageset. If it's the unclear future evolution wrt supporting subpages of large pages, should we just do nothing until somebody turns that hypothetical future into code and we see whether it works or not?
