Re: Discontiguous folios/pagesets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 28, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The current folio work is focused on permitting the VM to use
> physically contiguous chunks of memory.  Both Darrick and Johannes
> have pointed out the advantages of supporting logically-contiguous,
> physically-discontiguous chunks of memory.  Johannes wants to be able to
> use order-0 allocations to allocate larger folios, getting the benefit
> of managing the memory in larger chunks without requiring the memory
> allocator to be able to find contiguous chunks.  Darrick wants to support
> non-power-of-two block sizes.

What is the use case for non-power-of-two block sizes?  The main question
is whether that use case is important enough to add the complexity and
overhead in order to support it?

Cheers, Andreas





Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux