On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 8:22 PM Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 2021/8/23 20:57, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 03:54:01PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > >> > >> static void *dax_insert_entry(struct xa_state *xas, struct vm_fault *vmf, > >> const struct iomap_iter *iter, void > >> *entry, pfn_t pfn, > >> unsigned long flags) > >> > >> > >>> { > >>> + struct address_space *mapping = vmf->vma->vm_file->f_mapping; > >>> void *new_entry = dax_make_entry(pfn, flags); > >>> + bool dirty = insert_flags & DAX_IF_DIRTY; > >>> + bool cow = insert_flags & DAX_IF_COW; > >> > >> ...and then calculate these flags from the source data. I'm just > >> reacting to "yet more flags". > > > > Except for the overly long line above that seems like a good idea. > > The iomap_iter didn't exist for most of the time this patch has been > > around. > > > > So should I reuse the iter->flags to pass the insert_flags? (left shift > it to higher bits) No, the advice is to just pass the @iter to dax_insert_entry directly and calculate @dirty and @cow internally.