On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 11:26 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If anything, I'd make things more explicit. Stupid and
> straightforward. Maybe just "struct head_page" or something like that.
> Name it by what it *is*, not by analogies.
Btw, just to clarify: I don't love "struct head_page" either. It looks
clunky. But at least something like that would be a _straightforward_
clunky name.
Something like just "struct pages" would be less clunky, would still
get the message across, but gets a bit too visually similar.
Naming is hard.
Linus
