Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I think that's the point. gcc will not get it right. 

I don't think that's necessary an universal truth. It 
can be probably fixed.

> So we need to do it ourselves in the kernel sources.
> We may not like it, but it's the only way to guarantee reproducable
> reliable inline / noinline decisions.

For most things we don't really need it to be reproducable,
the main exception are the inlines in headers.

Universal noinline would also be a bad idea because of its
costs (4.1% text size increase). Perhaps should make it
a CONFIG option for debugging though.

-Andi



> 
> /D
> 
> -- 
> Dirk Hohndel
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
> 

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux