Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I vote for the, get rid of the current inline, rename __always_inline to 

There is some code that absolutely requires inline for correctness,
like the x86-64 vsyscall code. I would advocate to keep the
explicit __always_inline at least there to make it very clear.

> inline, and then remove all non needed inlines from the kernel.

Most inlines in .c should be probably dropped.

> 
> We'll, probably start adding a lot more noinlines.

That would cost you, see the numbers I posted (~4.1% text increase)

-Andi
-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux