Harvey Harrison wrote: > > A lot of code was written assuming inline means __always_inline, I'd suggest > keeping that assumption and working on removing inlines that aren't > strictly necessary as there's no way to know what inlines meant 'try to inline' > and what ones really should have been __always_inline. > > Not that I feel _that_ strongly about it. > Actually, we have that reasonably well down by now. There seems to be a couple of minor tweaking still necessary, but I think we're 90-95% there already. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
