Re: [PATCH v10 05/17] vhost-vdpa: Fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() on reset failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2021/7/29 下午3:34, Xie Yongji 写道:
Re-read the device status to ensure it's set to zero during
resetting. Otherwise, fail the vhost_vdpa_set_status() after timeout.

Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 11 ++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index b07aa161f7ad..dd05c1e1133c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
  	struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
  	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
  	u8 status, status_old;
-	int nvqs = v->nvqs;
+	int timeout = 0, nvqs = v->nvqs;
  	u16 i;
if (copy_from_user(&status, statusp, sizeof(status)))
@@ -173,6 +173,15 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
  		return -EINVAL;
ops->set_status(vdpa, status);
+	if (status == 0) {
+		while (ops->get_status(vdpa)) {
+			timeout += 20;
+			if (timeout > VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)
+				return -EIO;
+
+			msleep(20);
+		}


Spec has introduced the reset a one of the basic facility. And consider we differ reset here.

This makes me think if it's better to introduce a dedicated vdpa ops for reset?

Thanks


+	}
if ((status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) && !(status_old & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK))
  		for (i = 0; i < nvqs; i++)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux