Re: [PATCH v10 04/17] vdpa: Fail the vdpa_reset() if fail to set device status to zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2021/7/29 下午3:34, Xie Yongji 写道:
Re-read the device status to ensure it's set to zero during
resetting. Otherwise, fail the vdpa_reset() after timeout.

Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/vdpa.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
index 406d53a606ac..d1a80ef05089 100644
--- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
+++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  #include <linux/device.h>
  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
  #include <linux/vhost_iotlb.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
/**
   * struct vdpa_calllback - vDPA callback definition.
@@ -340,12 +341,24 @@ static inline struct device *vdpa_get_dma_dev(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
  	return vdev->dma_dev;
  }
-static inline void vdpa_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
+#define VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
+
+static inline int vdpa_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
  {
  	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
+	int timeout = 0;
vdev->features_valid = false;
  	ops->set_status(vdev, 0);
+	while (ops->get_status(vdev)) {
+		timeout += 20;
+		if (timeout > VDPA_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)
+			return -EIO;
+
+		msleep(20);
+	}


I wonder if it's better to do this in the vDPA parent?

Thanks


+
+	return 0;
  }
static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux