Re: [PATCH] iomap: Fix some typos and bad grammar

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Fix some typos and bad grammar in buffered-io.c to make the comments
> easier to read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me, though I'm less enthused about the parts of the diff
that combine words into contractions.

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 87ccb3438bec..3cc9da24fa83 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static inline struct iomap_page *to_iomap_page(struct page *page)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * per-block data is stored in the head page.  Callers should
> -	 * not be dealing with tail pages (and if they are, they can
> +	 * not be dealing with tail pages, and if they are, they can
>  	 * call thp_head() first.
>  	 */
>  	VM_BUG_ON_PGFLAGS(PageTail(page), page);
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ iomap_adjust_read_range(struct inode *inode, struct iomap_page *iop,
>  	unsigned last = (poff + plen - 1) >> block_bits;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If the block size is smaller than the page size we need to check the
> +	 * If the block size is smaller than the page size, we need to check the
>  	 * per-block uptodate status and adjust the offset and length if needed
>  	 * to avoid reading in already uptodate ranges.
>  	 */
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ iomap_adjust_read_range(struct inode *inode, struct iomap_page *iop,
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If the extent spans the block that contains the i_size we need to
> +	 * If the extent spans the block that contains the i_size, we need to
>  	 * handle both halves separately so that we properly zero data in the
>  	 * page cache for blocks that are entirely outside of i_size.
>  	 */
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ iomap_readpage_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>  done:
>  	/*
>  	 * Move the caller beyond our range so that it keeps making progress.
> -	 * For that we have to include any leading non-uptodate ranges, but
> +	 * For that, we have to include any leading non-uptodate ranges, but
>  	 * we can skip trailing ones as they will be handled in the next
>  	 * iteration.
>  	 */
> @@ -344,9 +344,9 @@ iomap_readpage(struct page *page, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Just like mpage_readahead and block_read_full_page we always
> +	 * Just like mpage_readahead and block_read_full_page, we always
>  	 * return 0 and just mark the page as PageError on errors.  This
> -	 * should be cleaned up all through the stack eventually.
> +	 * should be cleaned up throughout the stack eventually.
>  	 */
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ iomap_releasepage(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_mask)
>  	/*
>  	 * mm accommodates an old ext3 case where clean pages might not have had
>  	 * the dirty bit cleared. Thus, it can send actual dirty pages to
> -	 * ->releasepage() via shrink_active_list(), skip those here.
> +	 * ->releasepage() via shrink_active_list(); skip those here.
>  	 */
>  	if (PageDirty(page) || PageWriteback(page))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ iomap_invalidatepage(struct page *page, unsigned int offset, unsigned int len)
>  	trace_iomap_invalidatepage(page->mapping->host, offset, len);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If we are invalidating the entire page, clear the dirty state from it
> +	 * If we're invalidating the entire page, clear the dirty state from it
>  	 * and release it to avoid unnecessary buildup of the LRU.
>  	 */
>  	if (offset == 0 && len == PAGE_SIZE) {
> @@ -650,13 +650,13 @@ static size_t __iomap_write_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, size_t len,
>  	/*
>  	 * The blocks that were entirely written will now be uptodate, so we
>  	 * don't have to worry about a readpage reading them and overwriting a
> -	 * partial write.  However if we have encountered a short write and only
> +	 * partial write.  However, if we've encountered a short write and only
>  	 * partially written into a block, it will not be marked uptodate, so a
>  	 * readpage might come in and destroy our partial write.
>  	 *
> -	 * Do the simplest thing, and just treat any short write to a non
> -	 * uptodate page as a zero-length write, and force the caller to redo
> -	 * the whole thing.
> +	 * Do the simplest thing and just treat any short write to a
> +	 * non-uptodate page as a zero-length write, and force the caller to
> +	 * redo the whole thing.
>  	 */
>  	if (unlikely(copied < len && !PageUptodate(page)))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ iomap_write_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, void *data,
>  			bytes = length;
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Bring in the user page that we will copy from _first_.
> +		 * Bring in the user page that we'll copy from _first_.
>  		 * Otherwise there's a nasty deadlock on copying from the
>  		 * same page as we're writing to, without it being marked
>  		 * up-to-date.
> @@ -1153,7 +1153,7 @@ static void iomap_writepage_end_bio(struct bio *bio)
>   * Submit the final bio for an ioend.
>   *
>   * If @error is non-zero, it means that we have a situation where some part of
> - * the submission process has failed after we have marked paged for writeback
> + * the submission process has failed after we've marked pages for writeback
>   * and unlocked them.  In this situation, we need to fail the bio instead of
>   * submitting it.  This typically only happens on a filesystem shutdown.
>   */
> @@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ iomap_submit_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, struct iomap_ioend *ioend,
>  		error = wpc->ops->prepare_ioend(ioend, error);
>  	if (error) {
>  		/*
> -		 * If we are failing the IO now, just mark the ioend with an
> +		 * If we're failing the IO now, just mark the ioend with an
>  		 * error and finish it.  This will run IO completion immediately
>  		 * as there is only one reference to the ioend at this point in
>  		 * time.
> @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ iomap_alloc_ioend(struct inode *inode, struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  /*
>   * Allocate a new bio, and chain the old bio to the new one.
>   *
> - * Note that we have to do perform the chaining in this unintuitive order
> + * Note that we have to perform the chaining in this unintuitive order
>   * so that the bi_private linkage is set up in the right direction for the
>   * traversal in iomap_finish_ioend().
>   */
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ iomap_can_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc, loff_t offset,
>  
>  /*
>   * Test to see if we have an existing ioend structure that we could append to
> - * first, otherwise finish off the current ioend and start another.
> + * first; otherwise finish off the current ioend and start another.
>   */
>  static void
>  iomap_add_to_ioend(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct page *page,
> @@ -1287,9 +1287,9 @@ iomap_add_to_ioend(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct page *page,
>  /*
>   * We implement an immediate ioend submission policy here to avoid needing to
>   * chain multiple ioends and hence nest mempool allocations which can violate
> - * forward progress guarantees we need to provide. The current ioend we are
> - * adding blocks to is cached on the writepage context, and if the new block
> - * does not append to the cached ioend it will create a new ioend and cache that
> + * the forward progress guarantees we need to provide. The current ioend we're
> + * adding blocks to is cached in the writepage context, and if the new block
> + * doesn't append to the cached ioend, it will create a new ioend and cache that
>   * instead.
>   *
>   * If a new ioend is created and cached, the old ioend is returned and queued
> @@ -1351,7 +1351,7 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  	if (unlikely(error)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Let the filesystem know what portion of the current page
> -		 * failed to map. If the page wasn't been added to ioend, it
> +		 * failed to map. If the page hasn't been added to ioend, it
>  		 * won't be affected by I/O completion and we must unlock it
>  		 * now.
>  		 */
> @@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  	unlock_page(page);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Preserve the original error if there was one, otherwise catch
> +	 * Preserve the original error if there was one; catch
>  	 * submission errors here and propagate into subsequent ioend
>  	 * submissions.
>  	 */
> @@ -1395,8 +1395,8 @@ iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  /*
>   * Write out a dirty page.
>   *
> - * For delalloc space on the page we need to allocate space and flush it.
> - * For unwritten space on the page we need to start the conversion to
> + * For delalloc space on the page, we need to allocate space and flush it.
> + * For unwritten space on the page, we need to start the conversion to
>   * regular allocated space.
>   */
>  static int
> @@ -1411,7 +1411,7 @@ iomap_do_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
>  	trace_iomap_writepage(inode, page_offset(page), PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Refuse to write the page out if we are called from reclaim context.
> +	 * Refuse to write the page out if we're called from reclaim context.
>  	 *
>  	 * This avoids stack overflows when called from deeply used stacks in
>  	 * random callers for direct reclaim or memcg reclaim.  We explicitly
> @@ -1456,20 +1456,20 @@ iomap_do_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
>  		unsigned offset_into_page = offset & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
>  
>  		/*
> -		 * Skip the page if it is fully outside i_size, e.g. due to a
> -		 * truncate operation that is in progress. We must redirty the
> +		 * Skip the page if it's fully outside i_size, e.g. due to a
> +		 * truncate operation that's in progress. We must redirty the
>  		 * page so that reclaim stops reclaiming it. Otherwise
>  		 * iomap_vm_releasepage() is called on it and gets confused.
>  		 *
> -		 * Note that the end_index is unsigned long, it would overflow
> -		 * if the given offset is greater than 16TB on 32-bit system
> -		 * and if we do check the page is fully outside i_size or not
> -		 * via "if (page->index >= end_index + 1)" as "end_index + 1"
> -		 * will be evaluated to 0.  Hence this page will be redirtied
> -		 * and be written out repeatedly which would result in an
> -		 * infinite loop, the user program that perform this operation
> -		 * will hang.  Instead, we can verify this situation by checking
> -		 * if the page to write is totally beyond the i_size or if it's
> +		 * Note that the end_index is unsigned long.  If the given
> +		 * offset is greater than 16TB on a 32-bit system then if we
> +		 * checked if the page is fully outside i_size with
> +		 * "if (page->index >= end_index + 1)", "end_index + 1" would
> +		 * overflow and evaluate to 0.  Hence this page would be
> +		 * redirtied and written out repeatedly, which would result in
> +		 * an infinite loop; the user program performing this operation
> +		 * would hang.  Instead, we can detect this situation by
> +		 * checking if the page is totally beyond i_size or if its
>  		 * offset is just equal to the EOF.
>  		 */
>  		if (page->index > end_index ||
> -- 
> 2.26.3
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux