Re: A Third perspective on BTRFS nfsd subvol dev/inode number issues.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/2/21 7:39 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 02:18:29PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
For btrfs, the "location" is root.objectid ++ file.objectid.  I think
the inode should become (file.objectid ^ swab64(root.objectid)).  This
will provide numbers that are unique until you get very large subvols,
and very many subvols.

If you snapshot a filesystem, I'd expect, at least by default, that
inodes in the snapshot to stay the same as in the snapshotted
filesystem.

--b.


For copy on right systems like ZFS, how could it be otherwise?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux