Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:19:25 -0700
Cc: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-erofs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Huang Jianan <huangjianan@xxxxxxxx>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20210726145858.GA14066@lst.de>

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 04:58:58PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good to me:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Uh, did you mean RVB here?

--D

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
  - From: Gao Xiang
- Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] iomap: Support restarting direct I/O requests after user copy failures
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v8] iomap: make inline data support more flexible
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux