On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:22:47AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > -static loff_t > > -iomap_seek_hole_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t length, > > - void *data, struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap) > > +static loff_t iomap_seek_hole_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t *pos) > > /me wonders if @pos should be named hole_pos (here and in the caller) to > make it a little easier to read... Sure. > ...because what we're really saying here is that if seek_hole_iter found > a hole (and returned zero, thereby terminating the loop before iter.len > could reach zero), we want to return the position of the hole. Yes. > > + return size; > > Not sure why we return size here...? Oh, because there's an implicit > hole at EOF, so we return i_size. Uh, does this do the right thing if > ->iomap_begin returns posteof mappings? I don't see anything in > iomap_iter_advance that would stop iteration at EOF. Nothing in ->iomap_begin checks that, iomap_seek_hole initializes iter.len so that it stops at EOF.
