On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:56:29AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Will send out two patches for this. Note that I don't see this being a > real issue, as we explicitly gave the ring fd to another task, and being > that this is purely for read/write, it would result in -EFAULT anyway. You do realize that ->release() might come from seriously unexpected places, right? E.g. recvmsg() by something that doesn't expect SCM_RIGHTS attached to it will end up with all struct file references stashed into the sucker dropped, and if by that time that's the last reference - welcome to ->release() run as soon as recepient hits task_work_run(). What's more, if you stash that into garbage for unix_gc() to pick, *any* process closing an AF_UNIX socket might end up running your ->release(). So you really do *not* want to spawn any threads there, let alone possibly exfiltrating memory contents of happy recepient of your present...
