On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 11:45 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> - the code generation is actually quite good with both gcc and clang.
Side note: I only looked at whether the code looked good, I didn't
check whether it looked *correct*.
So caveat emptor. It looks trivially correct both on the source and
assembly level, but it's entirely untested, which probably means that
it has some stupid bug.
Linus
