Re: Folio tree for next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 03:46:52 +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Sure, let's go that way.  Linus wasn't terribly enthusiastic about the
> > folio patches and I can't claim to be overwhelmed by their value/churn
> > ratio (but many MM developers are OK with it all, and that
> > counts).  Doing it this way retains options...
> 
> I'm happy to take these three patches through my tree if it makes life
> easier (and it does resolve the majority of the pain):
> 
> mm, memcg: add mem_cgroup_disabled checks in vmpressure and swap-related functions
> mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} to improve disabled memcg config
> mm, memcg: inline swap-related functions to improve disabled memcg config

They're rather unimportant, can be deferred.

I'll probably move these to the post-linux-next queue, but let's just
do it and see how it goes.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux