Re: [PATCH V5 3/5]ext4: quota handling for delayed allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 06-01-09 10:35:29, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 05-01-09 20:40:55, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > ext4: quota reservation for delayed allocation
> > 
> > Uses quota reservation/claim/release to handle quota properly for delayed
> > allocation in the three steps: 1) quotas are reserved when data being copied
> > to cache when block allocation is defered 2) when new blocks are allocated.
> > reserved quotas are converted to the real allocated quota, 2) over-booked
> > quotas for metadata blocks are released back.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx>
>   The patch looks fine as far as I can tell :). But I'm not to familiar
> with the code so I won't add my Acked-by...
  On a second thought:

> > +unsigned long long ext4_get_reserved_space(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long long total;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > +	total = EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks +
> > +		EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks;
> > +	spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> > +
> > +	return total;
> > +}
  Shouldn't we return here (total << inode->i_blksize)? Quota expects
bytes as output...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux