On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 11:18:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +static inline void set_page_writeback_keepwrite(struct page *page)
> > {
> > + folio_start_writeback_keepwrite(page_folio(page));
> > }
> >
> > +static inline bool test_set_page_writeback(struct page *page)
> > {
> > + return set_page_writeback(page);
> > }
>
> Shouldn't these be in folio-compat.c as well?
Thought about it. We only have one caller of
set_page_writeback_keepwrite(), so it may as well get inlined there.
And test_set_page_writeback() is just a renaming ... I'd rather
replace the callers of test_set_page_writeback() with calls to
the new set_page_writeback() than move it into folio-compat.
> Otherwise looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
