On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:07:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:05 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Last I checked, the fault_in_readable actually read a byte from
> > the page. It has to wait for the read to complete before that can
> > happen.
>
> Yeah, we don't have any kind of async fault-in model.
>
> I'm not sure how that would even look. I don't think it would
> necessarily be *impossible* (special marker in the exception table to
> let the fault code know that this is a "prepare" fault), but it would
> be pretty challenging.
It wouldn't be _that_ bad necessarily. filemap_fault:
page = find_get_page(mapping, offset);
...
} else if (!page) {
fpin = do_sync_mmap_readahead(vmf);
... and we could return at that point if the flag was set. There'd be
some more details to fill in (if there's a !uptodate page in the page
cache, don't wait for it), but it might not be too bad.
