Re: [RFC] what to do with IOCB_DSYNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:16:50PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 04:09:56PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 03:03:07PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > i suggested that to viro last night, and he pointed out that ioctl(S_SYNC)
> > 
> > Where would that S_SYNC ioctl be implemented?
> 
> xfs_diflags_to_iflags(
>         if (xflags & FS_XFLAG_SYNC)
>                 flags |= S_SYNC;
> 
> (mutatis mutandi per filesystem)


Ok, your description above wasn't very exact.

Anyway, that at least doesn't go out to the superblock.  But if Al
dislikes it we can also make generic_sync_file and friends check
IS_SYNC() again.  Having a single flag is kinda nice as it avoids
stupid errors, but if we actually have a performance problem here
(do we have any data on that?) just going back to the old way would
seem like the simplest fix.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux