Re: [PATCH] afs: fix tracepoint string placement with built-in AFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Looks fine to me, and even saves 4 bytes on 64 bit machines (events are
> rounded up to 4 byte increments, so the u16 is no different than a u32
> here).

Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?

David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux