Andrei Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Without this fix, if we try to run a script that contains only the
> interpreter line, the interpreter is executed with one extra empty
> argument.
>
> The code is written so that i_end has to be set to the end of valuable
> data in the buffer.
Out of curiosity how did you spot this change in behavior?
> Fixes: ccbb18b67323 ("exec/binfmt_script: Don't modify bprm->buf and then return -ENOEXEC")
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/binfmt_script.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/binfmt_script.c b/fs/binfmt_script.c
> index 1b6625e95958..e242680f96e1 100644
> --- a/fs/binfmt_script.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_script.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> if (!next_terminator(i_end, buf_end))
> return -ENOEXEC;
> i_end = buf_end;
> + /* Trim zero bytes from i_end */
> + while (i_end[-1] == 0)
> + i_end--;
> }
> /* Trim any trailing spaces/tabs from i_end */
> while (spacetab(i_end[-1]))
