Re: [PATCH 1/9] exofs: osd Swiss army knife

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
>> +int prepare_get_attr_list_add_entry(struct osd_request *req,
>> +				    uint32_t page_num,
>> +				    uint32_t attr_num,
>> +				    uint32_t attr_len)
>> +{
>> +	struct osd_attr attr = {
>> +		.page = page_num,
> 
> Kernel developers expect a field called "page" to have type `struct
> page *'.  osd_attr.page is thus designed to confuse.
> 
>> ...
>>
> 

Rant below (can be ignored):
  This single fix will cause a massive change to the open-osd
  initiator patchset, (18 patches), and resubmission .I made the mistake
  because this name originates from a file that all naming conventions
  are taken from the OSD standard text. However this is no excuse
  for using a well known Kernel construct name. I will fix it. And
  will be more careful in the future.

Thanks
Boaz
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux