On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:55:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 05:53:33PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 01:23:22PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > i have a somewhat similar series in the works ... > > > > > > https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/commitdiff/1e7e8c2d82666b55690705d5bbe908e31d437edb > > > https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/commitdiff/bf767a4969c0bc6735275ff7457a8082eef4c3fd > > > > > > ... the other patches rather depend on the folio work. > > > > Yes, these looks useful to me as well. > > > And in fact I suspect the code in __set_page_dirty_no_writeback should > really be the default if no ->set_page_dirty is set up. It is the > same code as the no-mapping case and really makes sense as the default > case.. yes; i was even wondering if that should be conditional on one of the "no writeback" bits in mapping ...