On Fri 2021-06-11 23:59:53, Jia He wrote:
> After the behaviour of specifier '%pD' is changed to print full path
> of struct file, the related test cases are also updated.
>
> Given the string is prepended from the end of the buffer, the check
> of "wrote beyond the nul-terminator" should be skipped.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/test_printf.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_printf.c b/lib/test_printf.c
> index ec0d5976bb69..3632bd6cf906 100644
> --- a/lib/test_printf.c
> +++ b/lib/test_printf.c
> @@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ do_test(int bufsize, const char *expect, int elen,
> return 1;
> }
>
> - if (memchr_inv(test_buffer + written + 1, FILL_CHAR, BUF_SIZE + PAD_SIZE - (written + 1))) {
> + if (!is_prepend_buf && memchr_inv(test_buffer + written + 1, FILL_CHAR, BUF_SIZE + PAD_SIZE - (written + 1))) {
> pr_warn("vsnprintf(buf, %d, \"%s\", ...) wrote beyond the nul-terminator\n",
> bufsize, fmt);
> return 1;
> @@ -496,6 +498,27 @@ dentry(void)
> test(" bravo/alfa| bravo/alfa", "%12pd2|%*pd2", &test_dentry[2], 12, &test_dentry[2]);
> }
>
> +static struct vfsmount test_vfsmnt = {};
> +
> +static struct file test_file __initdata = {
> + .f_path = { .dentry = &test_dentry[2],
> + .mnt = &test_vfsmnt,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static void __init
> +f_d_path(void)
> +{
> + test("(null)", "%pD", NULL);
> + test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_INVALID);
> +
> + is_prepend_buf = true;
> + test("/bravo/alfa |/bravo/alfa ", "%-14pD|%*pD", &test_file, -14, &test_file);
> + test(" /bravo/alfa| /bravo/alfa", "%14pD|%*pD", &test_file, 14, &test_file);
> + test(" /bravo/alfa|/bravo/alfa ", "%14pD|%-14pD", &test_file, &test_file);
Please, add more test for scenarios when the path does not fit into
the buffer or when there are no limitations, ...
I still have to think about is_prepend_buf hack.
> + is_prepend_buf = false;
> +}
> +
> static void __init
> struct_va_format(void)
> {
Best Regards,
PEtr
