Re: [REPOST PATCH v4 3/5] kernfs: switch kernfs to use an rwsem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The kernfs global lock restricts the ability to perform kernfs node
> lookup operations in parallel during path walks.
>
> Change the kernfs mutex to an rwsem so that, when opportunity arises,
> node searches can be done in parallel with path walk lookups.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/kernfs/dir.c             |  117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  fs/kernfs/file.c            |    4 +
>  fs/kernfs/inode.c           |   16 +++---
>  fs/kernfs/kernfs-internal.h |    5 +-
>  fs/kernfs/mount.c           |   12 ++--
>  fs/kernfs/symlink.c         |    4 +
>  include/linux/kernfs.h      |    2 -
>  7 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> index 5151c712f06f5..1e2e35a201dfb 100644
> --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>  
>  #include "kernfs-internal.h"
>  
> -DEFINE_MUTEX(kernfs_mutex);
> +DECLARE_RWSEM(kernfs_rwsem);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_rename_lock);	/* kn->parent and ->name */
>  static char kernfs_pr_cont_buf[PATH_MAX];	/* protected by rename_lock */
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_idr_lock);	/* root->ino_idr */
> @@ -26,10 +26,21 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kernfs_idr_lock);	/* root->ino_idr */
>  
>  static bool kernfs_active(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_mutex);
>  	return atomic_read(&kn->active) >= 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool kernfs_active_write(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kernfs_rwsem);
> +	return kernfs_active(kn);
> +}
> +
> +static bool kernfs_active_read(struct kernfs_node *kn)
> +{
> +	lockdep_assert_held_read(&kernfs_rwsem);
> +	return kernfs_active(kn);
> +}

This bit is unnecessary and confusing.  There is nothing read/write
about how the kernfs file is active (aka being used be a function).
Further all that is needed for correct operation is:

>  static bool kernfs_active(struct kernfs_node *kn)
>  {
> -	lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_mutex);
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&kernfs_rwsem);
>  	return atomic_read(&kn->active) >= 0;
>  }

Eric



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux