Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > While the dentry operation kernfs_dop_revalidate() is grouped with > dentry type functions it also has a strong affinity to the inode > operation ->lookup(). > > In order to take advantage of the VFS negative dentry caching that > can be used to reduce path lookup overhead on non-existent paths it > will need to call kernfs_find_ns(). So, to avoid a forward declaration, > move it to be near kernfs_iop_lookup(). > > There's no functional change from this patch. Does this patch compile independently? During the code movement kernfs_active is replaced by kernfs_active_read which does not exist yet. Eric > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/kernfs/dir.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c > index 7e0e62deab53c..4c69e2af82dac 100644 > --- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c > @@ -548,49 +548,6 @@ void kernfs_put(struct kernfs_node *kn) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernfs_put); > > -static int kernfs_dop_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) > -{ > - struct kernfs_node *kn; > - > - if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) > - return -ECHILD; > - > - /* Always perform fresh lookup for negatives */ > - if (d_really_is_negative(dentry)) > - goto out_bad_unlocked; > - > - kn = kernfs_dentry_node(dentry); > - mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex); > - > - /* The kernfs node has been deactivated */ > - if (!kernfs_active(kn)) > - goto out_bad; > - > - /* The kernfs node has been moved? */ > - if (kernfs_dentry_node(dentry->d_parent) != kn->parent) > - goto out_bad; > - > - /* The kernfs node has been renamed */ > - if (strcmp(dentry->d_name.name, kn->name) != 0) > - goto out_bad; > - > - /* The kernfs node has been moved to a different namespace */ > - if (kn->parent && kernfs_ns_enabled(kn->parent) && > - kernfs_info(dentry->d_sb)->ns != kn->ns) > - goto out_bad; > - > - mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex); > - return 1; > -out_bad: > - mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex); > -out_bad_unlocked: > - return 0; > -} > - > -const struct dentry_operations kernfs_dops = { > - .d_revalidate = kernfs_dop_revalidate, > -}; > - > /** > * kernfs_node_from_dentry - determine kernfs_node associated with a dentry > * @dentry: the dentry in question > @@ -1073,6 +1030,49 @@ struct kernfs_node *kernfs_create_empty_dir(struct kernfs_node *parent, > return ERR_PTR(rc); > } > > +static int kernfs_dop_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags) > +{ > + struct kernfs_node *kn; > + > + if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU) > + return -ECHILD; > + > + /* Always perform fresh lookup for negatives */ > + if (d_really_is_negative(dentry)) > + goto out_bad_unlocked; > + > + kn = kernfs_dentry_node(dentry); > + mutex_lock(&kernfs_mutex); > + > + /* The kernfs node has been deactivated */ > + if (!kernfs_active_read(kn)) > + goto out_bad; > + > + /* The kernfs node has been moved? */ > + if (kernfs_dentry_node(dentry->d_parent) != kn->parent) > + goto out_bad; > + > + /* The kernfs node has been renamed */ > + if (strcmp(dentry->d_name.name, kn->name) != 0) > + goto out_bad; > + > + /* The kernfs node has been moved to a different namespace */ > + if (kn->parent && kernfs_ns_enabled(kn->parent) && > + kernfs_info(dentry->d_sb)->ns != kn->ns) > + goto out_bad; > + > + mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex); > + return 1; > +out_bad: > + mutex_unlock(&kernfs_mutex); > +out_bad_unlocked: > + return 0; > +} > + > +const struct dentry_operations kernfs_dops = { > + .d_revalidate = kernfs_dop_revalidate, > +}; > + > static struct dentry *kernfs_iop_lookup(struct inode *dir, > struct dentry *dentry, > unsigned int flags)