Re: Corruption with O_DIRECT and unaligned user buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:19:11PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> Result of cost-of-fork() on ia64.
> ==
>   size of memory  before  after
>   Anon=1M   	, 0.07ms, 0.08ms
>   Anon=10M  	, 0.17ms, 0.22ms
>   Anon=100M 	, 1.15ms, 1.64ms
>   Anon=1000M	, 11.5ms, 15.821ms
> ==
> 
> fork() cost is 135% when the process has 1G of Anon.

Not sure where the 135% number comes from. The above number shows a
performance decrease of 27% or a time increase of 37% which I hope is
inline with the overhead introduced by the TestSetPageLocked in the
fast path (which I didn't expect to be so bad), but that it's almost
trivial to eliminate with a smb_wmb in add_to_swap_cache and a smb_rmb
in fork. So we'll need to repeat this measurement after replacing the
TestSetPageLocked with smb_rmb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux