Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] quota: Add mountpath based quota support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed 12-05-21 17:03:46, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:01:49PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Added a few more CCs.
> > 
> > On Tue 16-03-21 12:29:16, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Thu 04-03-21 13:35:38, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > Current quotactl syscall uses a path to a block device to specify the
> > > > filesystem to work on which makes it unsuitable for filesystems that
> > > > do not have a block device. This series adds a new syscall quotactl_path()
> > > > which replaces the path to the block device with a mountpath, but otherwise
> > > > behaves like original quotactl.
> > > > 
> > > > This is done to add quota support to UBIFS. UBIFS quota support has been
> > > > posted several times with different approaches to put the mountpath into
> > > > the existing quotactl() syscall until it has been suggested to make it a
> > > > new syscall instead, so here it is.
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not posting the full UBIFS quota series here as it remains unchanged
> > > > and I'd like to get feedback to the new syscall first. For those interested
> > > > the most recent series can be found here: https://lwn.net/Articles/810463/
> > > 
> > > Thanks. I've merged the two patches into my tree and will push them to
> > > Linus for the next merge window.
> > 
> > So there are some people at LWN whining that quotactl_path() has no dirfd
> > and flags arguments for specifying the target. Somewhat late in the game
> > but since there's no major release with the syscall and no userspace using
> > it, I think we could still change that. What do you think? What they
> > suggest does make some sense. But then, rather then supporting API for
> > million-and-one ways in which I may wish to lookup a fs object, won't it be
> > better to just pass 'fd' in the new syscall (it may well be just O_PATH fd
> > AFAICT) and be done with that?
> 
> This sounds like a much cleaner interface to me. If we agree on this I
> wouldn't mind spinning this patch for another few rounds.

So the syscall is currently disabled in Linus' tree. Will you send a patch
for new fd-based quotactl variant?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux