Re: Corruption with O_DIRECT and unaligned user buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 07:51:49PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> > diff -ur rhel-5.2/kernel/fork.c x/kernel/fork.c
> > --- rhel-5.2/kernel/fork.c	2008-07-10 17:26:43.000000000 +0200
> > +++ x/kernel/fork.c	2008-12-18 15:57:31.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@
> >  		rb_parent = &tmp->vm_rb;
> >  
> >  		mm->map_count++;
> > -		retval = copy_page_range(mm, oldmm, mpnt);
> > +		retval = copy_page_range(mm, oldmm, tmp);
> >  
> 
> Could you explain a bit why this change is needed?

This change is needed to pass the child vma (not the parent vma) to
handle_mm_fault. We run handle_mm_fault on the child not on the
parent, so the vma passed to handle_mm_fault has to be the one of the
child obviously. It won't make a difference for the other users of the
vma because both vma are basically the same. Nick did it btw.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux