Muntz, Daniel <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > AFS was designed to support local disk cache, so with callbacks you can get a > consistent system. It's less the callbacks and more the data version number that's important. > I'll ass-u-me that Linux flavors of AFS have callbacks. They do. > It should be possible to *integrate* NFSv4.x with FS-Cache similarly (i.e., I > don't think you could drop it in as a 'black-box' without breaking something, > unless you explicitly build an independent proxy cache server). NFSv4 has equivalents of both the data version number and callbacks. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
