Re: [PATCH v3] proc: Use seq_read_iter for /proc/*/maps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 1:21 PM Arusekk <arek_koz@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> Keeping it the way it is for the sake of security of userspace applications
> looks more like security through obscurity to me.

No, it's simply "no valid use" and "why expose interfaces that don't
need to be exposed".

splice() _has_ been a security issue before. It's why I want to limit
it now. I want to enable it only for cases that seem to be worth
enabling for.

Have we fixed all the splice security issues? I certainly hope so. Are
you correct in stating that there are probably other places that might
be more interesting to attackers? Sure. But none of that changes the
basic issue: why expose this?

                Linus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux