Re: [PATCH 0/8, v3] ensure symlinks are NUL-terminated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/12/16 Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Duane,
> I see you left out jfs, so I'm assuming you're letting me handle that
> one.  I've push my patch upstream, so it should show up in the -next
> tree.

That's right, since jfs doesn't need the helper and your patch was a
full and complete fix. I should have clarified whether that was how
you wanted it handled, sorry.

Which reminds me, I need to follow up about the original befs and 9p
patches which didn't make it to the list and haven't been ACKed or
NAKed yet...

> Shaggy

Cheers,
Duane.

-- 
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux