Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v21 0/9] Free some vmemmap pages of HugeTLB page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/28/21 9:02 PM, Muchun Song wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:32 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 4/28/21 5:26 AM, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 7:47 AM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!  I will take a look at the modifications soon.
>>>>
>>>> I applied the patches to Andrew's mmotm-2021-04-21-23-03, ran some tests and
>>>> got the following warning.  We may need to special case that call to
>>>> __prep_new_huge_page/free_huge_page_vmemmap from alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page
>>>> as it is holding hugetlb lock with IRQs disabled.
>>>
>>> Good catch. Thanks Mike. I will fix it in the next version. How about this:
>>>
>>> @@ -1618,7 +1617,8 @@ static void __prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate
>>> *h, struct page *page)
>>>
>>>  static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid)
>>>  {
>>> +       free_huge_page_vmemmap(h, page);
>>>         __prep_new_huge_page(page);
>>>         spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>>         __prep_account_new_huge_page(h, nid);
>>>         spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>> @@ -2429,6 +2429,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct
>>> hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
>>>         if (!new_page)
>>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>> +       free_huge_page_vmemmap(h, new_page);
>>>  retry:
>>>         spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>>         if (!PageHuge(old_page)) {
>>> @@ -2489,7 +2490,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct
>>> hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
>>>
>>>  free_new:
>>>         spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>>> -       __free_pages(new_page, huge_page_order(h));
>>> +       update_and_free_page(h, new_page, false);
>>>
>>>         return ret;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Another option would be to leave the prep* routines as is and only
>> modify alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page as follows:
> 
> OK. LGTM. I will use this. Thanks Mike.

There are issues with my suggested patch below.  I am occasionally
hitting the BUG that checks for page ref count being zero at put_page
time.  Still do not fully understand, but I do not hit the same BUG
with your patch above.  Please do not use my patch below.

-- 
Mike Kravetz

>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index 9c617c19fc18..f8e5013a6b46 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -2420,14 +2420,15 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
>>
>>         /*
>>          * Before dissolving the page, we need to allocate a new one for the
>> -        * pool to remain stable. Using alloc_buddy_huge_page() allows us to
>> -        * not having to deal with prep_new_huge_page() and avoids dealing of any
>> -        * counters. This simplifies and let us do the whole thing under the
>> -        * lock.
>> +        * pool to remain stable.  Here, we allocate the page and 'prep' it
>> +        * by doing everything but actually updating counters and adding to
>> +        * the pool.  This simplifies and let us do most of the processing
>> +        * under the lock.
>>          */
>>         new_page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL, NULL);
>>         if (!new_page)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>> +       __prep_new_huge_page(h, new_page);
>>
>>  retry:
>>         spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>> @@ -2473,7 +2474,6 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
>>                  * Reference count trick is needed because allocator gives us
>>                  * referenced page but the pool requires pages with 0 refcount.
>>                  */
>> -               __prep_new_huge_page(h, new_page);
>>                 __prep_account_new_huge_page(h, nid);
>>                 page_ref_dec(new_page);
>>                 enqueue_huge_page(h, new_page);
>> @@ -2489,7 +2489,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
>>
>>  free_new:
>>         spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
>> -       __free_pages(new_page, huge_page_order(h));
>> +       update_and_free_page(h, old_page, false);
>>
>>         return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> Mike Kravetz



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux