Re: [PATCH] proc: Use seq_read_iter where possible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 08:12:59 CEST, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Patching what entry point?

The instructions at the entry point of the executable being inspected.
The flow of the tool:
- parse ELF headers of the binary to be inspected,
- locate its entry point position in the file,
- write short code at the location (this short code has used sendfile so far),
- execute the patched binary,
- parse the output and extract information about the relevant mappings.
This can be seen as equivalent to setting LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS,
but also works for static binaries, and is a bit safer.

The problem was reported at:
https://github.com/Gallopsled/pwntools/issues/1871

> Linus did object to blindly switching over all instances.

I know, I read that, but I thought that pointing a real use case, combined 
with the new interface being used all throughout the other code, might be 
convincing.
I would be happy with only changing the f_ops of /proc/.../maps, even if only 
on MMU-enabled systems, but I thought that consistence would be better.
This is my first time contributing to Linux, so I am very sorry for any wrong 
assumptions, and glad to learn more.

-- 
Arusekk





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux