On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:43 PM Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This patch introduces an optional info record that describes the > source (as in the region of the source-code where an event was > initiated). This record is not produced for other type of existing > notification, but it is optionally enabled for FAN_ERROR notifications. > I find this functionality controversial, because think that the fs provided s_last_error*, s_first_error* is more reliable and more powerful than this functionality. Let's leave it for a future extending proposal, should fanotify event reporting proposal pass muster, shall we? Or do you think that without this optional extension fanotify event reporting will not be valuable enough? Thanks, Amir.
