I added the "Four fixes for ITER_XARRAY" patch and got things running again. I ran the tests I had regressions on by themselves, and I still fail generic/075, generic/112, generic/127 and generic/263. generic/438 passes now. I was analyzing what test 075 was doing when it was failing, and I found it to be doing this: /home/hubcap/xfstests-dev/ltp/fsx -d -N 1000 -S 0 -P /home/hubcap/xfstests-dev /pvfsmnt/whatever The above used to fail every time... now it works every time. Progress :-). I'm about to launch the whole suite of tests, I'll report back on what happens later... -Mike On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:53 AM Mike Marshall <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Is it easy to set up an orangefs client and server? > > I think it is easy to set up a test system on a single VM, > but I do it all the time. I souped up the build details in > Documentation/filesystems/orangefs.rst not too long > ago, I hope it is useful. > > Your VM would need to be a "developer" VM, > with all the autotools stuff and such if you build > from source. I also worked on the configure stuff > so that you would learn about any packages you > lack at configure time, I hope that is also still good. > > I read your message about trying again with the > "Four fixes for ITER_XARRAY" patch, I'll report > on how that goes... > > -Mike > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 3:49 AM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Mike Marshall <hubcap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >> I wonder if you should use iov_length(&iter) > > > > > > iov_length has two arguments. The first one would maybe be iter.iov and > > > the second one would be... ? > > > > Sorry, I meant iov_iter_count(&iter). > > > > I'll look at the other things next week. Is it easy to set up an orangefs > > client and server? > > > > David > >
