On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:13:54PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > Add a paragraph that explains that it may happen that the counters in > /proc/meminfo do not add up to the overall memory usage. ... that is, the sum may be lower because memory is allocated for other purposes that is not reported here, right? Is it ever possible for it to be higher? Maybe due to a race when sampling the counters? > Provides information about distribution and utilization of memory. This > -varies by architecture and compile options. The following is from a > -16GB PIII, which has highmem enabled. You may not have all of these fields. > +varies by architecture and compile options. Please note that it may happen > +that the memory accounted here does not add up to the overall memory usage > +and the difference for some workloads can be substantial. In many cases there > +are other means to find out additional memory using subsystem specific > +interfaces, for instance /proc/net/sockstat for TCP memory allocations. How about just: +varies by architecture and compile options. The memory reported here +may not add up to the overall memory usage and the difference for some +workloads can be substantial. [...] But I'd like to be a bit more explicit about the reason, hence my question above to be sure I understand. It's also not entirely clear which of the fields in meminfo can be usefully summed. VmallocTotal is larger than MemTotal, for example. But I know that KernelStack is allocated through vmalloc these days, and I don't know whether VmallocUsed includes KernelStack or whether I can sum them. Similarly, is Mlocked a subset of Unevictable? There is some attempt at explaining how these numbers fit together, but it's outdated, and doesn't include Mlocked, Unevictable or KernelStack
