>> But that isn't really system memory at all, it's just allocated device >> memory. > OK, that was not really clear to me. So this is not really accounted to > MemTotal? If that is really the case then reporting it into the oom > report is completely pointless and I am not even sure /proc/meminfo is > the right interface either. It would just add more confusion I am > afraid. > Why is it confusing? Documentation is quite clear: "Provides information about distribution and utilization of memory. This varies by architecture and compile options." A topology with VRAM fits very well on that. The point is to have an overview. >>> See where I am heading? >> Yeah, totally. Thanks for pointing this out. >> >> Suggestions how to handle that? > As I've pointed out in previous reply we do have an API to account per > node memory but now that you have brought up that this is not something > we account as a regular memory then this doesn't really fit into that > model. But maybe I am just confused.
