Re: [PATCH, v2] ext3: ensure link targets are NULL-terminated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:26:05 +0000 "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ensure link targets are NUL-terminated, even if corrupted on-disk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Duane Griffin <duaneg@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> V2: terminate when the link is read instead of every time it is
> followed, as suggested by Dave Kleikamp.
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> index f8424ad..c168781 100644
> --- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
> @@ -2817,9 +2817,10 @@ struct inode *ext3_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  		inode->i_op = &ext3_dir_inode_operations;
>  		inode->i_fop = &ext3_dir_operations;
>  	} else if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
> -		if (ext3_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode))
> +		if (ext3_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode)) {
>  			inode->i_op = &ext3_fast_symlink_inode_operations;
> -		else {
> +			((char *) ei->i_data)[inode->i_size] = '\0';
> +		} else {
>  			inode->i_op = &ext3_symlink_inode_operations;
>  			ext3_set_aops(inode);
>  		}

Really?  The ext2 on-disk format requires that the fast symlink be
null-terminated on disk?  Even though the length is already in i_size?

It seems that's true.  How un-ext2-like.

ext2 and ext4 need the same fix, yes?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux