Re: [RFC PATCH v5 19/19] ceph: add fscrypt ioctls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:03:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 16:38 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > Hi Jeff!
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:32:27PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > We gate most of the ioctls on MDS feature support. The exception is the
> > > key removal and status functions that we still want to work if the MDS's
> > > were to (inexplicably) lose the feature.
> > > 
> > > For the set_policy ioctl, we take Fcx caps to ensure that nothing can
> > > create files in the directory while the ioctl is running. That should
> > > be enough to ensure that the "empty_dir" check is reliable.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/ceph/ioctl.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/ioctl.c b/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> > > index 6e061bf62ad4..34b85bcfcfc7 100644
> > > --- a/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> > > +++ b/fs/ceph/ioctl.c
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > >  #include "mds_client.h"
> > >  #include "ioctl.h"
> > >  #include <linux/ceph/striper.h>
> > > +#include <linux/fscrypt.h>
> > >  
> > >  /*
> > >   * ioctls
> > > @@ -268,8 +269,56 @@ static long ceph_ioctl_syncio(struct file *file)
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int vet_mds_for_fscrypt(struct file *file)
> > > +{
> > > +	int i, ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > +	struct ceph_mds_client	*mdsc = ceph_sb_to_mdsc(file_inode(file)->i_sb);
> > > +
> > > +	mutex_lock(&mdsc->mutex);
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < mdsc->max_sessions; i++) {
> > > +		struct ceph_mds_session *s = mdsc->sessions[i];
> > > +
> > > +		if (!s)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +		if (test_bit(CEPHFS_FEATURE_ALTERNATE_NAME, &s->s_features))
> > > +			ret = 0;
> > > +		break;
> > > +	}
> > > +	mutex_unlock(&mdsc->mutex);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static long ceph_set_encryption_policy(struct file *file, unsigned long arg)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret, got = 0;
> > > +	struct page *page = NULL;
> > > +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
> > > +	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
> > > +
> > > +	ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Ensure we hold these caps so that we _know_ that the rstats check
> > > +	 * in the empty_dir check is reliable.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	ret = ceph_get_caps(file, CEPH_CAP_FILE_SHARED, 0, -1, &got, &page);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	if (page)
> > > +		put_page(page);
> > > +	ret = fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(file, (const void __user *)arg);
> > > +	if (got)
> > > +		ceph_put_cap_refs(ci, got);
> > > +	return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  long ceph_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > >  {
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +	struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(file_inode(file));
> > > +
> > >  	dout("ioctl file %p cmd %u arg %lu\n", file, cmd, arg);
> > >  	switch (cmd) {
> > >  	case CEPH_IOC_GET_LAYOUT:
> > > @@ -289,6 +338,51 @@ long ceph_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > >  
> > >  	case CEPH_IOC_SYNCIO:
> > >  		return ceph_ioctl_syncio(file);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
> > > +		return ceph_set_encryption_policy(file, arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY:
> > > +		ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY_EX:
> > > +		ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_get_policy_ex(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY:
> > > +		ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +		atomic_inc(&ci->i_shared_gen);
> > 
> > I've spent a few hours already looking at the bug I reported before, and I
> > can't really understand this code.  What does it mean to increment
> > ->i_shared_gen at this point?
> > 
> > The reason I'm asking is because it looks like the problem I'm seeing goes
> > away if I remove this code.  Here's what I'm doing/seeing:
> > 
> > # mount ...
> > # fscrypt unlock d
> > 
> >   -> 'd' dentry is eventually pruned at this point *if* ->i_shared_gen was
> >      incremented by the line above.
> > 
> > # cat d/f
> > 
> >   -> when ceph_fill_inode() is executed, 'd' isn't *not* set as encrypted
> >      because both ci->i_xattrs.version and info->xattr_version are both
> >      set to 0.
> > 
> 
> Interesting. That sounds like it might be the bug right there. "d"
> should clearly have a fscrypt context in its xattrs at that point. If
> the MDS isn't passing that back, then that could be a problem.
> 
> I had a concern about that when I was developing this, and I *thought*
> Zheng had assured us that the MDS will always pass along the xattr blob
> in a trace. Maybe that's not correct?

Hmm, that's what I thought too.  I was hoping not having to go look at the
MDS, but seems like I'll have to :-)

> > cat: d/f: No such file or directory
> > 
> > I'm not sure anymore if the issue is on the client or on the MDS side.
> > Before digging deeper, I wonder if this ring any bell. ;-)
> > 
> > 
> 
> No, this is not something I've seen before.
> 
> Dentries that live in a directory have a copy of the i_shared_gen of the
> directory when they are instantiated. Bumping that value on a directory
> should basically ensure that its child dentries end up invalidated,
> which is what we want once we add the key to the directory. Once we add
> a key, any old dentries in that directory are no longer valid.
> 
> That said, I could certainly have missed some subtlety here.

Great, thanks for clarifying.  This should help me investigate a little
bit more.

[ And I'm also surprised you don't see this behaviour as it's very easy to
  reproduce. ]

Cheers,
--
Luís

> > 
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_ordered(file_inode(file));
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_complete(file_inode(file));
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_add_key(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY:
> > > +		atomic_inc(&ci->i_shared_gen);
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_ordered(file_inode(file));
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_complete(file_inode(file));
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_remove_key(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY_ALL_USERS:
> > > +		atomic_inc(&ci->i_shared_gen);
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_ordered(file_inode(file));
> > > +		ceph_dir_clear_complete(file_inode(file));
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_remove_key_all_users(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_KEY_STATUS:
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_get_key_status(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > > +
> > > +	case FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE:
> > > +		ret = vet_mds_for_fscrypt(file);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +		return fscrypt_ioctl_get_nonce(file, (void __user *)arg);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	return -ENOTTY;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.30.2
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux