Re: Samba speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:21:14AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Here's a really interesting paper from Intel
> that they recently brought to my attention.
> 
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/windows-client-cifs-behavior-can-slow-linux-nas-performance
> 
> Looks like using XFS for your Linux Samba
> server, or setting "strict allocate = yes" can make
> a big difference due to sparse file issues.

Glibc 2.7 (as shipped in Ubuntu Hardy) has posix_fallocate wired up to
the fallocate system call, and ext4 supports delayed allocation as
well as preallocation.  There are number of userspace applications ---
rsync, samba, and most bittorrent applications come to mind --- where
use of fallocate would be a big win.

            	     	       	     	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux